Corruption in Cuba: Castro and beyond
Diaz-Briquets is executive director of the Council for Human Development in Alexandria, Virginia and Vice President of Casals and Associates, a Washington area-based consulting firm.
List of Tables and Figure
1956
1 Taxonomy of Corruption in Socialist Societies
1967
NO The Nature of Corruption and Its Consequences
1987
1 Levels of Corruption and Vulnerabilities in
3 Types of Corruption in the Health Sector
4 Types of Corruptive Political Practices and Their
THREE Roots of Corruption in Cuba
FOUR Determinants of Corruption in Socialist Cuba
2 Monthly Rations per Adult in Pounds Selected
4 Selected Independent Nongovernmental
1 Selected Cuban Sociedades Anonimas S A
1 Organizational Structure of GAESA
4 Governance Indicators for Cuba 19962004
5 Cuba in the Index of Economic Freedom 1996
SEVEN Averting Corruption in the Long Term
저작권
1 Estimated Share Percentage of State Ownership
While Fidel Castro maintains his longtime grip on Cuba, revolutionary scholars and policy analysts have turned their attention from how Castro succeeded (and failed), to how Castro himself will be succeeded—by a new government. Among the many questions to be answered is how the new government will deal with the corruption that has become endemic in Cuba. Even though combating corruption cannot be the central aim of post-Castro policy, Sergio Díaz-Briquets and Jorge Pérez-López suggest that, without a strong plan to thwart it, corruption will undermine the new economy, erode support for the new government, and encourage organized crime. In short, unless measures are taken to stem corruption, the new Cuba could be as messy as the old Cuba.
Fidel Castro did not bring corruption to Cuba; he merely institutionalized it. Official corruption has crippled Cuba since the colonial period, but Castro's state-run monopolies, cronyism, and lack of accountability have made Cuba one of the world's most corrupt states. The former communist countries in Eastern Europe were also extremely corrupt, and analyses of their transitional periods suggest that those who have taken measures to control corruption have had more successful transitions, regardless of whether the leadership tilted toward socialism or democracy. To that end, Díaz-Briquets and Pérez-López, both Cuban Americans, do not advocate any particular system for Cuba's next government, but instead prescribe uniquely Cuban policies to minimize corruption whatever direction the country takes after Castro. As their work makes clear, averting corruption may be the most critical obstacle in creating a healthy new Cuba.